Multi-Agent Coordination Methodology
Status: Production-Ready Success Rate: 100% (validated across multiple sessions) Last Updated: 2025-10-02
Overview
Section titled “Overview”This guide documents the proven methodology for coordinating multiple AI agents to work in parallel on well-scoped, independent tasks. This approach has been successfully used to coordinate 10+ specialized personas with zero conflicts and 100% completion rates.
Table of Contents
Section titled “Table of Contents”- When to Use Multi-Agent Coordination
- Core Principles
- Planning Phase
- Execution Phase
- Integration Phase
- Tools & Technologies
- Case Studies
- Troubleshooting
When to Use
Section titled “When to Use”Ideal Scenarios
Section titled “Ideal Scenarios”✅ Use multi-agent coordination when:
- You have 5+ independent tasks that can run in parallel
- Tasks have clear, well-defined scopes and success criteria
- No blocking dependencies between tasks
- Each task maps to a specific domain of expertise
- You need to maximize throughput and minimize time-to-completion
Not Recommended
Section titled “Not Recommended”❌ Don’t use multi-agent coordination when:
- Tasks have complex dependencies requiring sequential execution
- Scope is unclear or requires discovery/exploration
- Tasks involve the same files/code (high conflict risk)
- Single task can be completed faster than coordination overhead
- You need iterative feedback loops between tasks
Core Principles
Section titled “Core Principles”1. Independence
Section titled “1. Independence”Each agent must be able to complete their task without waiting for other agents.
- No shared file edits
- No blocking dependencies
- Clear boundaries between work areas
2. Specialization
Section titled “2. Specialization”Match each task to an agent with the right domain expertise.
| Task Type | Recommended Agent Type |
|---|---|
| Testing & QA | quality-engineer |
| Security & Auth | security-engineer |
| API Documentation | technical-writer |
| Infrastructure | devops-architect |
| Frontend/UX | frontend-architect |
| Performance | performance-engineer |
| Refactoring | refactoring-expert |
| System Design | system-architect |
| Code Quality | python-expert (strong typing) |
3. Clear Success Criteria
Section titled “3. Clear Success Criteria”Every agent must know exactly what “done” looks like.
Example success criteria:
## Success Criteria- Zero test files remain in /src directory- All imports updated correctly- Jest discovers all migrated tests- At least one test runs successfully4. Conflict Prevention
Section titled “4. Conflict Prevention”Proactively design work areas to avoid conflicts.
Spatial Separation:
- Agent A:
/src/libdirectory - Agent B:
/src/app/apidirectory - Result: Zero overlap, zero conflicts
File Type Separation:
- Agent A: Test files only
- Agent B: Source code only
- Result: Different file sets, zero conflicts
5. Coordination Layer
Section titled “5. Coordination Layer”Use a coordination agent to orchestrate, monitor, and integrate.
The coordinator:
- Reviews all deliverables
- Checks for conflicts
- Updates tracking systems (GitHub, TODO.md)
- Creates integration reports
- Identifies blockers
Planning Phase
Section titled “Planning Phase”Step 1: Decompose the Work
Section titled “Step 1: Decompose the Work”Break down the high-level goal into atomic, independent tasks:
Goal: Improve codebase quality
Task Breakdown:1. Migrate test files (Quinn - quality-engineer)2. Enable TypeScript strict checks (Morgan - python-expert)3. Fix production build (Riley - devops-architect)4. Document API endpoints (Jordan - technical-writer)5. Migrate console.log (Casey - refactoring-expert)6. Optimize Docker layers (Finn - devops-architect)Step 2: Dependency Analysis
Section titled “Step 2: Dependency Analysis”Create a dependency graph to verify independence:
graph LR A[Quinn: Tests] --> INDEPENDENT B[Morgan: TypeScript] --> INDEPENDENT C[Riley: Build] --> INDEPENDENT D[Jordan: API Docs] --> INDEPENDENT E[Casey: Logger] --> INDEPENDENT F[Finn: Docker] --> INDEPENDENTIf dependencies exist, either:
- Sequence dependent tasks
- Find alternative decomposition
- Reduce scope to eliminate dependency
Step 3: Conflict Analysis
Section titled “Step 3: Conflict Analysis”File Overlap Matrix:
| Agent A | Agent B | Agent C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent A | - | Check | Check |
| Agent B | Check | - | Check |
| Agent C | Check | Check | - |
For each pair, verify:
- Different directories? ✅
- Different file types? ✅
- Different concern layers? ✅
Step 4: Create Agent Specifications
Section titled “Step 4: Create Agent Specifications”For each agent, document:
## Agent: [Name] ([Domain])
**Task:** [One sentence description]**Issue:** #[number]**Agent Type:** [e.g., quality-engineer]
**Scope:**- File patterns: src/lib/*.ts- Exclusions: tests/, __mocks__/- Actions: Read, Edit, Write
**Success Criteria:**- [ ] Criterion 1- [ ] Criterion 2- [ ] Criterion 3
**Deliverables:**1. [Specific artifact 1]2. [Specific artifact 2]3. GitHub comment to issue #[number]
**Constraints:**- Don't modify [X]- Stay within [directory]- Follow [pattern]Step 5: Use MCP Sequential Thinking
Section titled “Step 5: Use MCP Sequential Thinking”Before deployment, use sequential thinking to validate the plan:
// PseudocodesequentialThinking({ thought: "Analyze dependency graph for persona coordination", verifyIndependence: true, checkConflicts: true, estimateTime: true})Execution Phase
Section titled “Execution Phase”Parallel Deployment
Section titled “Parallel Deployment”Deploy all agents in a single message for maximum parallelization:
// Deploy 10 agents simultaneously<function_calls> <invoke name="Task" subagent_type="quality-engineer">...</invoke> <invoke name="Task" subagent_type="python-expert">...</invoke> <invoke name="Task" subagent_type="devops-architect">...</invoke> // ... 7 more agents <invoke name="Task" subagent_type="system-architect">...</invoke>